header-logo header-logo

08 December 2023 / Laura Benghiat
Issue: 8052 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

CPR 14: Admissions revisited

150647
Laura Benghiat examines the recent changes to the rules on admissions
  • Part 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules sets out the formal process for making and withdrawing admissions.
  • Those provisions were amended with effect from 1 October 2023.
  • What do practitioners need to know, and should keep in mind, in relation to the revised rules on admissions?

There has been a wealth of reporting related to the changes made to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) on 1 October 2023. With headline grabbers such as the extension of the fixed costs regime coming into force on that date, litigators may be forgiven for not having paid much attention to the amendments made to CPR 14 and admissions.

With the revisions arguably extending to more than a mere simplification of the regime though, and the amended provisions applying to all litigation, irrespective of the nature or value of the claim, the time might be ripe to revisit the rules.

Admissions

For the majority of litigators, the process of making and considering admissions is likely to be largely linked to the pleadings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll