header-logo header-logo

16 April 2020 / Suzanne Rab
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

COVID-19 & virtual mediation

Managing the virtual mediation process: what next for ADR after COVID-19, asks Professor Suzanne Rab

  • Coronavirus: response of the legal profession.
  • Virtual mediation: a dispute resolution solution that does not revolve around physical meetings.

The outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic continues to affect the legal profession alongside other major industries in unprecedented ways. Lockdowns and social distancing measures have enforced court closures and, with more limited virtual alternatives, this situation will increase delays in dealing with backlogs. In order to deal with this novel situation, the profession’s response is largely going to focus on leveraging tech-based solutions to keep the wheels of justice moving. Already, courts are using video conferencing technology to conduct hearings. While significant flexibility has been shown by both judges and litigants in participating in video-hearings, more radical shifts are required to manage the impact on both existing and pipeline cases. Furthermore, supply-chain issues, employment disputes and other commercial matters emerging from the pandemic itself will further burden the justice system in the coming weeks and months. It is therefore inevitable that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll