header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Keeping the show on the road

21 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail
Barristers, solicitors, court staff, judiciary, and all those others who support court users have been praised for working ‘around the clock to explore and deliver extraordinary changes at great pace’

Susan Acland-Hood, CEO of HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS), in a Bar Council blog, said she was proud of how the legal profession has united to keep the justice system running. Senior judges have made decisions to ensure the most urgent cases are prioritised while continuing less urgent work by other means, she noted, while HMCTS had increased the number of teleconferences it can run using BTMeetMe and videoconferences using Skype for Business.

Looking ahead, Acland-Hood said HMCTS is testing and expanding its use of a fully video hearings system, the ‘cloud video platform’ (CVP), which has been used in certain civil, family and tax tribunal hearings. She said about 85% of cases are using audio and video technology. She added that HMCTS is keen to hear feedback from ‘everyone involved’.

Judges have been instructed to conduct hearings remotely where possible, while the Ministry of Justice has consolidated courts and buildings into fewer buildings to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. Currently, 160 court buildings are open to the public for essential hearings and a further 116 courts are staffed but closed to the public with parties accessing proceedings remotely. The Crown Prosecution Service has instructed prosecutors to prioritise serious cases to manage the impact of the pandemic.

Meanwhile, family lawyers have warned that couples face delays of several months to process divorce petitions, and the situation is likely to get worse.

Divorce is categorised by HMCTS as ‘work that we will do our best to do’. According to Lisa Pepper, partner, Osbornes Law, the latest guidance from Bury St Edmunds Divorce Centre reveals it is processing petitions received seven weeks ago, decree nisi applications are taking 11 weeks and consent orders are taking 13 weeks.

Pepper said: ‘The divorce courts, which were already over stretched are facing a crisis because of the coronavirus pandemic. It is crucial that this problem is addressed to ensure that delays don’t get any worse.’

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll