header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Is your court open, staffed or suspended?

14 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Law Society has produced an interactive map to help solicitors and members of the public find out which courts are operational during the COVID-19 pandemic

This follows Ministry of Justice action to consolidate courts and tribunals into fewer buildings to make best use of resources and help prevent the spread of the coronavirus. 

The interactive heat map will be updated as more data becomes available.

Simon Davis, President of the Law Society said: ‘This tool illustrates which courts and tribunals buildings continue to be operational.

‘Where appropriate steps are taken to ensure good hygiene, appropriate distancing, and compliance with all other relevant guidance to minimise risk, they should be safe to attend.’

There are 160 court buildings open to the public for essential face-to-face hearings. A further 116 staffed courts are open to justice system employees and judges but not to the public, with parties involved in hearings accessing proceedings remotely via video or telephone. 75 courts have been closed temporarily.

Davis said: ‘The question will inevitably arise to what extent we can, or even should, return wholesale to previous ways of working once this crisis subsides.

‘The reality is that such a profound shift will likely alter permanently how we uphold justice and the rule of law. Therefore we must monitor carefully which of the technological solutions are sustainable for the long-term, to ensure that increases in efficiencies do not inadvertently come at the expense of justice being not only done but seen to be done.

 ‘Courts must be able to re-open once this crisis abates. We must be wary to avoid any risk of significant and permanent damage to the public’s ability to access to justice.’

In addition to the heat map, practitioners can look at HM Courts and Tribunals tracker list for the latest information on which courts are open, staffed and suspended. Find it at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals-tracker-list-during-coronavirus-outbreak.

For contact details and information about courts and tribunals in your area, go to: https://www.gov.uk/find-court-tribunal.

For advice and guidance for court and tribunal users during the pandemic, visit: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-courts-and-tribunals-planning-and-preparation.

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll