header-logo header-logo

02 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Hardship payments for legal aid lawyers

The Law Society and Bar Council have given a mixed reaction to the government’s announcement of extra support for legal aid lawyers

The support includes expanding the scope and relaxing the evidence requirements for hardship payments in Crown court cases, including reducing the threshold for work done to £1,000, rather than the current £5,000.

Legal aid fees for First Tier Tribunal immigration and asylum appeals have been aligned with HM Courts and Tribunals Service’s move to an online system for these cases.

The Legal Aid Agency has also increased payments for virtual hearings in appeals before the Mental Health Tribunal, and for remote advice in police custody to ensure they are in line with in-person hearings. It has halted pursuit of outstanding debts owed to it, and is encouraging law firms to make the most of existing help, such as the ability to apply for early payment for work already done on a case.

Chair of the Bar, Amanda Pinto QC, said the measures would ‘have little impact on the many criminal legal aid barristers whose livelihood depends on conducting important criminal trials.

‘The changes, albeit made in a spirit of helpfulness, will have no effect on the overwhelming majority of criminal barristers.’

Law Society President Simon Davis said: ‘It still remains difficult to judge the scale of this crisis.

‘Whether this response is adequate will depend, among other things, on how quickly the police and courts are able to find new ways of handling more routine work―and thus maintaining a volume of cases throughout this period.

‘It will also depend to what extent, if and when some form of normality resumes, workload increases above their pre-crisis levels―enabling practitioners to recover lost income. This cannot be presumed. Even if so, it would require practitioners to incur significant additional costs long before they see such an increase.

‘Thus, there is significantly more that needs to be done to ensure the criminal defence sector is able to make it through this crisis.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll