header-logo header-logo

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Half of barristers’ businesses could collapse in six months without financial assistance

An alarming 30% of barristers say they are experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19, and more than half expect to in future, according to the latest Bar Council research

An alarming 30% of barristers say they are experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19, and more than half expect to in future, according to the latest Bar Council research

Although the courts are conducting hearings remotely where possible and continuing to hold essential hearings in person, practitioners have experienced a major drop-off in hearings and other work, the Bar Council said. 3,470 barristers (20% of the total) responded to its survey, published this week.

The survey found 65% of self-employed barristers have seen a reduction in work―the typical barrister has gone from working more than 50 hours to fewer than 18 hours per week.

However, only 14% of the self-employed bar are applying for the government’s rescue scheme (the self-employed income support scheme (SEISS)), and only five per cent said they would apply for the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme. Regarding the loan scheme, the survey reported ‘considerable reluctance to take on further debt when it is unclear when and how it can be paid back. Those who become bankrupt are prohibited from practising at the Bar’.

Applicants for SEISS grants must have filed a 2018/19 tax return, been self-employed before 6 April 2019, earn more than 50% of income through self-employment and have an annual trading profit of less than £50,000.

In terms of business sustainability, 53% of self-employed say they can’t survive six months under current conditions without financial aid of some sort, and 74% can’t survive a year. The situation is worse for the criminal bar, where 31% of barristers say they would not last three months without financial aid, 69% would not last six months and 88% would no longer be practising within a year.

Barristers in the first seven years of practice are the most vulnerable―83% say they can’t survive a year under current conditions without financial aid.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council (pictured), said: ‘Barristers and others involved in the justice system are rightly classed as key workers by the government, because they are essential to ensuring that justice continues to be delivered for the public, despite the pandemic.

‘A threat to the barristers’ profession survival is a threat to the future of our justice system… we might very well find there are no barristers left to help pick up the pieces of the justice system after the crisis subsides.’

The Bar Council has called on the Treasury to expand its rescue scheme to increase the threshold above £50,000 trading profit for self-employed barristers so that more of the junior bar will be eligible, and to allow different types of evidence for the self-employed scheme so that those without 2018/19 tax returns can apply. It is also calling for an urgent rescue package for those at the publicly funded bar who are ineligible for the self-employed scheme.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll