header-logo header-logo

03 August 2020
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Grants & schemes for lawyers

A committee of MPs has backed the Bar Council’s call for the Self-Employed Income Support Scheme to be extended to new and returning practitioners

In a report published this week, ‘Coronavirus (Covid-19): The impact on the legal professions in England and Wales’, the Justice Committee supports the use of evidence other than tax returns to be used for the scheme. Currently, only those who submitted a 2018-19 tax return are eligible.

The MPs also backed the Law Society’s proposals for monthly payments of criminal legal aid to law firms and not-for-profit providers, and postponement of repayments, and it recommended further government grants to law centres and not-for-profit legal services providers. It called on the MoJ to report back and state, if it chose not to provide grants, what provision it would make for users of those law centres that cease operations.

The committee heard evidence from the Law Centres Network that ‘if lost earnings are not replaced soon, Law Centres stand to lose £3m in earned income within six months and, having used up their already scant reserves, the half of them most reliant on legal aid income would face closure’.

The committee’s chair, Sir Robert Neill said: ‘I know some people won’t have a lot of sympathy for lawyers who dress up in fancy gowns and speak a language of their own.

‘People are under the misapprehension they are all on comfortable incomes. Some are, but very many, especially given their recent big drop in workload, are not.

‘The Ministry of Justice needs to consider further grants for those working in Law Centres and others in the not-for-profit Legal Aid sector. Otherwise, the next time a victim of a crime or a defendant – both of whom may be on modest incomes - has a brush with the legal system, they may find they have no access to real justice.’

Sir Bob also called on the MoJ to ‘set out how it will make sure that this pandemic does not disproportionately affect the incomes of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic, or state-educated, legal professionals’.

The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said: ‘I am working very hard, not just with the Treasury but internally, to see what more can be done to help the flow of regular income to the professions, particularly those at the sharp end of legal aid.’

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Justice Committee made many constructive recommendations. Importantly, the committee recognises Covid-19’s disproportionate impact on BAME and state-educated legal professionals. We know the budget exists. The Lord Chancellor said he is working hard to help. If he fails, justice will regress to society’s detriment.’

Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll