header-logo header-logo

29 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Courts will review £1,200 employee fees

Unison wins permission to challenge employment tribunal fees

The High Court has given Unison, the trade union, permission to bring a judicial review challenging the introduction of employment tribunal fees.

The hearing is due to take place in October. Unison succeeded at an oral hearing in the High Court this week, although its paper application failed. However, the court rejected its application for an injunction to prevent the fees coming into force.

As of this week, employees and ex-employees will need to pay £160–£250 to issue a claim, and a hearing fee of £230–£950. Groups issuing a claim will pay higher fees of £320–£1,500 to issue claims and £460–£5,700 for a hearing.

The lower range of fees will apply to simpler cases such as wages claims, while the higher fees will apply to unfair dismissal and discrimination cases.

Previously, claimants did not pay fees.

In its legal challenge, Unison will argue that:

  • the fees are prohibitively expensive, and the national courts have a duty under EU law not to make it excessively difficult to exercise individual rights;
  • fees are not payable in most tribunal claims therefore it breaches the principle of equivalence;
  • there has been no proper assessment of the public sector equality duty; and
  • the fees will have a disproportionate impact on women.

Remissions will be granted in certain circumstances. An unmarried claimant with no children will not qualify if they are earning over £13,000. A married person with four children will be ineligible if the combined household income exceeds £29,000.

Employment law barrister Elizabeth George, of Leigh Day & Co said employers “will be less inclined to abide by their legal obligations as the risk of being challenged will be much reduced”.

However, justice minister Helen Grant said it was important to reduce the financial burden of the £74m employment tribunal system.

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll