header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Court reform under fire

Lawyers have highlighted their concerns about the £1.3bn court reform programme, following a devastating report by the National Audit Office (NAO).

The NAO report, ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’, published last week, highlighted several failures in implementation, singling out the common platform, the digital case management for the criminal courts, which has been affected by repeated delays, as being ‘of most concern’. For example, in September 2022, the rollout was paused after HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) found the system failed to send more than 3,000 ‘important notifications’ to partner agencies between June 2021 and August 2022. As a result of this, in 35 cases an individual was not fitted with an electronic monitoring tag when they should have been.

The NAO said HMCTS’s focus on delivering reforms quickly has created extra burdens for the criminal courts when they were already under pressure. Despite this, the December 2023 deadline for completion is unlikely to be met.

Other problems included that many online divorce and probate cases needed manual interventions by court staff despite the relevant project being marked as complete.

In terms of value for money, the NAO found HMCTS now expects lifetime savings of £2bn from the reforms—£310m lower than estimates in 2019, when the NAO last reported, owing to revised assumptions, design changes and higher ongoing costs.

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘Many of the problems with the court reform programme identified in the NAO report echo the experiences we have heard from barristers on the ground.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Our concern, reflected in the NAO’s report, is that delays in the courts are being exacerbated by ineffective reforms, which are costing more time and wasting money.’ She called on HMCTS to provide an updated timetable for completion.

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll