header-logo header-logo

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Court reform programme over budget & under-delivering

MPs have delivered a blistering verdict on the management of the issue-ridden court reform programme.

Publishing its ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’ report last week, the Public Accounts Committee expressed serious concerns that HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has just £120m left of its total £1.3bn budget despite completing only 24 of 44 reform projects.

Following some timetable revisions, HMCTS now plans to deliver most reforms by March 2024. Its digital case-management system, Common Platform, is expected to complete in March 2025, more than a year behind schedule.

The committee highlighted numerous technical issues encountered during the roll-out of Common Platform, which created stress for court staff already coping with large backlogs of cases. It noted issues with some reformed services resulted in solicitors not receiving necessary notifications. Moreover, HMCTS had ‘not done enough to listen’ to court users’ concerns.

The committee’s chair, Dame Meg Hillier MP, said: ‘These are services crying out for critical reform, but frustratingly HMCTS’s attempts appear in some cases to be actively hindering its own staff’s ability to carry out their jobs.

‘HMCTS has now burnt through almost its entire budget for a programme of reform only a little over halfway complete.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, said the committee’s criticisms ‘echo the experiences we hear from barristers, especially in relation to Common Platform.

‘To date, the programme has not delivered on its promise of saving time and costs. In some cases, the introduction of Common Platform has slowed the system down, reducing court capacity.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Feedback from our members has been that the speed of change and the number of changes all at once has been problematic.

‘Rolling out unfinished or untested software drives delays and costs, as we have seen with Common Platform.’

Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll