header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Court of Protection rules on vaccine mistrust

A 31-year-old severely learning-disabled man can be given a COVID-19 vaccine against his father’s wishes, the Court of Protection has held in CR v SR [2021] EWCOP 19. 

While acknowledging the father’s views were ‘genuinely held’, Judge Butler said his reasons had ‘no clinical evidence base’ and were based on what he believed ‘were the consequences of the MMR injection and the autism of his son’.

These views were ‘based upon the discredited theories of Dr Andrew Wakefield (advanced in 1998)’, which were formally retracted by Dr Wakefield in 2020 and resulted in him being struck off the Medical Register. 

Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll