header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Court grants service by blockchain

Mr Justice Trower in the High Court has granted permission to serve court documents on unknown fraudsters via the transfer of a token on blockchain, in a legal first

D’Aloia v Binance Holdings & Others [2022] EWHC 1723 (Ch), is the first reported court order of its kind in Europe, and second only to a case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in June (LCX AG v John Does Nos 1-25).

D’Aloia concerned an application for an urgent injunction made by Mr D’Aloia, the Italian founder of an online gambling company. He had discovered unknown persons had cloned his online brokerage and were misappropriating his cryptocurrency to encourage investors to place trades into two wallets.

According to Giambrone solicitors, acting for Mr D’Aloia, the court order is significant for two reasons. First, it allowed service by way of NFT (non-fungible token) airdrop to the two wallets and opens the way to use blockchain technology to serve proceedings in international crypto disputes thus overcoming a practical hurdle. Second, it recognised the five cryptocurrency exchange defendants held Mr D’Aloia’s cryptocurrency as constructive trustees. This means the exchanges are responsible for making sure the crypto is ringfenced and not moved on or withdrawn.

Giambrone associate Joanna Bailey said: ‘The importance of the court’s finding of a good arguable case of constructive trustee liability cannot be overstated.

‘Should cryptocurrency exchanges act contrary to such orders and fail to ringfence the identifiable cryptocurrency, they risk being held liable for breach of trust.’

Alternative service via various online methods has previously been authorised by the English Courts under CPR 6.15, including Instagram, Facebook and via a ‘contact’ section of the defendant’s website, but never before by means of distributed ledger technology (like blockchain).

Kate Gee, counsel at Signature Litigation, said: ‘Crypto exchanges must now take seriously the risks of claims against them for breach of trust, and take robust steps to ringfence identifiable cryptocurrency that is the subject of a dispute.’

Zoe Wyatt, partner at Andersen in the UK, said: ‘This case gives hope to those who have fallen victim to cryptoasset scams.’

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll