header-logo header-logo

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Court competition hots up

England & Wales working to stay ahead of global markets

London’s commercial courts are increasingly international, but competition from regional hubs remains fierce, according to an annual report.

The Commercial Courts Report 2018, commissioned by communications agency Portland, analyses the 158 judgments from the London commercial courts between March 2017 and April 2018. It found that 656 litigants from 69 countries were represented in the past year, up from 62 countries in 2015/16.

More than 40% (267 litigants) were from the UK. Kazakhstan accounted for 31 litigants, the second highest nationality in terms of representation. Russian and US litigants were the joint third most likely nationality to appear, with 20 litigants each. Next came, in order, Germany, UAE, Singapore, Turkey, Cyprus, Panama, India, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Jersey.

There was also a 22% increase in the total number of litigants using the commercial courts compared to 2017. However, London faces stiff competition from abroad, such as the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts (DIFC), the Qatar International Court (QIC), the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts (ADGMC) and the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC).

Charles Balmain, committee member of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA), and a partner at White & Case, said: ‘The English court system remains amongst the global elite, known worldwide for the high calibre of its Judges.

‘We are already seeing the English courts react to keep ahead of growing competition from other fora. In particular, we are seeing increased use of technology, and the trial of new, streamlined, disclosure processes aimed at balancing the benefit of this process with the time and cost involved. We are confident that such improvements will only heighten the popularity of England as a forum for dispute resolution and are delighted to see this reflected in the Commercial Courts Report 2018.’ 

Philip Hall, partner at Portland, said the London Commercial Courts are well placed but ‘cannot be complacent’.

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll