header-logo header-logo

14 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Court clarifies duties to protect unaccompanied children

Unaccompanied children housed in Home Office-run hotels are protected in full by the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the High Court has held.

Ruling last week in Article 39 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 1398 (Fam), Mrs Justice Lieven held that local authorities have full powers and duties to protect such children, under ChA 1989.

Children’s charity Article 39 sought to trigger the court’s inherent jurisdiction to make wardship orders in relation to several unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who have gone missing from Home Office-run hotels in Brighton and Hove. It successfully argued the Home Office had no power to house the children.

Concerns were raised following reports that children were going missing. The court heard evidence that 76 children went missing, of which 22 are now 17 years old, and one is 16 years old, while others have been located, leaving 23 under-16-year-olds still missing.

Delivering judgment, Lieven J said the court’s inherent jurisdiction, while ‘very broad’, should not be used where there were statutory powers in place to do the same job.

‘Lying behind this proposition is the fundamental constitutional principle that where there is a statutory scheme, the court should only use the inherent jurisdiction if there is a lacuna,’ Lieven J said. She held the children were the responsibility of a local authority, and the fact they were missing and therefore it was not possible to know which local authority was responsible did ‘not arise because of a lacuna in the statutory scheme’.

Carolyne Willow, director at Article 39, said: ‘This judgment has brought vital clarity to a wholly unacceptable situation where extremely vulnerable children have been treated as being in “legal limbo”, outside the protection of [ChA 1989]. That was a fiction which unforgivably exposed children to serious harm.’

Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll