header-logo header-logo

14 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Court clarifies duties to protect unaccompanied children

Unaccompanied children housed in Home Office-run hotels are protected in full by the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the High Court has held.

Ruling last week in Article 39 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 1398 (Fam), Mrs Justice Lieven held that local authorities have full powers and duties to protect such children, under ChA 1989.

Children’s charity Article 39 sought to trigger the court’s inherent jurisdiction to make wardship orders in relation to several unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who have gone missing from Home Office-run hotels in Brighton and Hove. It successfully argued the Home Office had no power to house the children.

Concerns were raised following reports that children were going missing. The court heard evidence that 76 children went missing, of which 22 are now 17 years old, and one is 16 years old, while others have been located, leaving 23 under-16-year-olds still missing.

Delivering judgment, Lieven J said the court’s inherent jurisdiction, while ‘very broad’, should not be used where there were statutory powers in place to do the same job.

‘Lying behind this proposition is the fundamental constitutional principle that where there is a statutory scheme, the court should only use the inherent jurisdiction if there is a lacuna,’ Lieven J said. She held the children were the responsibility of a local authority, and the fact they were missing and therefore it was not possible to know which local authority was responsible did ‘not arise because of a lacuna in the statutory scheme’.

Carolyne Willow, director at Article 39, said: ‘This judgment has brought vital clarity to a wholly unacceptable situation where extremely vulnerable children have been treated as being in “legal limbo”, outside the protection of [ChA 1989]. That was a fiction which unforgivably exposed children to serious harm.’

Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll