header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / Chris Brierly , Patrick Boylan , Will Francis
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Counting the Total cost

Patrick Boylan, Will Francis & Chris Brierly examine costs issues arising from the Buncefield litigation

The Buncefield litigation was one of the largest cases in the Commercial Court in 2008. At its height, it involved over a hundred parties. The claimant group was diverse, spanning individual home owners whose property had suffered damage, to the oil majors BP and Shell.  

While the legal issues in the case were complex, the facts were straightforward. On 11 December 2005, petrol from an underground pipeline was being received into an overground storage tank.

The operator on duty negligently failed to switch the flow to a further empty tank once the original one had become full.

This resulted in 300 tonnes of fuel overflowing from the tank, which subsequently formed a vapour cloud, which then ignited and generated the biggest explosion ever to have taken place in peacetime Europe.

Denial

Over the following two and a half years the defendant (Total) denied negligence, and also claimed that it was foreseeable only that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll