header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / Chris Brierly , Patrick Boylan , Will Francis
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Counting the Total cost

Patrick Boylan, Will Francis & Chris Brierly examine costs issues arising from the Buncefield litigation

The Buncefield litigation was one of the largest cases in the Commercial Court in 2008. At its height, it involved over a hundred parties. The claimant group was diverse, spanning individual home owners whose property had suffered damage, to the oil majors BP and Shell.  

While the legal issues in the case were complex, the facts were straightforward. On 11 December 2005, petrol from an underground pipeline was being received into an overground storage tank.

The operator on duty negligently failed to switch the flow to a further empty tank once the original one had become full.

This resulted in 300 tonnes of fuel overflowing from the tank, which subsequently formed a vapour cloud, which then ignited and generated the biggest explosion ever to have taken place in peacetime Europe.

Denial

Over the following two and a half years the defendant (Total) denied negligence, and also claimed that it was foreseeable only that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll