header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Penny Booth
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Counting the cost

Penny Booth asks who pays for the children in same sex relationships?

A case heard in the Leeds High Court last month, (as yet unreported) highlights again the issue of who pays for children when relationships end, and the more general question of what we understand by “parent”. It is the possible ramifications which are of interest to practitioners. The future may well bring more such cases to the high street practitioner who will have to advise on this and related issues in same sex relationships (particularly those with children) in the future.

The basic information on this case is that a former same sex couple who began their relationship in 1994 and lived together until 2007 (but did not enter into a formal relationship and therefore had no civil partnership) were attempting to resolve issues of maintenance in respect of a child for whom both appeared to have had caring responsibilities. The child was born as a result of treatment using an authorised clinic and anonymous donor sperm after they both applied for the natural mother to have treatment. Upon the breakdown of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll