header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs without proceedings

If a claimant makes a CPR Pt 36 offer before the issue of proceedings and...

If a claimant makes a CPR Pt 36 offer before the issue of proceedings and that offer is accepted, is the claimant entitled to his costs? It is clear that he would be if proceedings had been issued, but Pt 36 makes no comment on the costs effect of a pre-issue offer being accepted. Alternatively, if a claimant were to make a pre-issue Pt 36 offer and included a provision that acceptance was conditional on payment of the claimant’s costs would that be a valid offer for the purposes of Pt 36 or not? As a substantial amount of work is often needed to prepare a claimant Pt 36 offer it would seem fair, and in the spirit of avoiding unnecessary proceedings, if costs could be recovered pre-issue. If they cannot, one would be better off issuing and then making a Pt 36 offer immediately thereafter?

As a matter of vires, the CPR only apply to proceedings which have by definition begun. The court may take account of conduct before issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll