header-logo header-logo

03 September 2015
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Costs warning in expensive divorce

A judge has executed a costs deterrent after “deceptive” presentations in a divorce case.

The couple had spent an estimated combined £2m in costs in the UK as well as legal fees in France and Switzerland.

In Joy v Joy-Morancho & Others [2015] EWHC 2507 (Fam), the wife sought £27m but the husband claimed he faced “financial ruin”. The couple had spent an estimated combined £2m in costs in the UK as well as legal fees in France and Switzerland.

Ordering the husband to pay the wife’s costs since May 2013—about £334,000—Sir Peter Singer said: “Where one party hatches a wholly deceptive presentation, pursues it persistently to the conclusion, and is found to have done precisely all of that, then he or she should expect no quarter from the court when it comes to costs. Such conduct unravels all and can and should in an extreme case where the conclusions are clear have clear costs condemnation meted out as the court’s response.”

Issue: 7666 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll