header-logo header-logo

03 November 2017
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs—Order for costs

R (on the application of Agyemang) v Haringey London Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1630, [2017] All ER (D) 145 (Oct)

There would be no order for costs in the case of a publicly funded claimant whose case against the defendant local authority had been settled. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division held that on the facts it was impossible to predict whether the claimant would have obtained the subsistence payments she had been seeking and therefore the case fell within the second limb of the test in R (M) v Croydon London Borough Council.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll