header-logo header-logo

02 December 2011 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The costs of going solo

Michael Cook examines the financial implications of litigants in person

By definition you will never act for a litigant in person (LIP); but however much you may wish to ignore them, “Lippies”, as they are affectionately known, are not going to go away. Their rates have been increased, legal aid is to dwindle yet again, so they will proliferate.

Successive governments cannot be accused of offering financial inducements to litigants to do it themselves. As Sir Rupert Jackson observed in Chapter 14 of the final report of his Review of Civil Litigation Costs, the hourly rate allowed to successful litigants in person had not been increased from £9.25 per hour since 1 December 1995. Applying the average earnings index for private sector services, the figure in December 2009 would have risen to £15.32, while annual increases of £1 had resulted in the equivalent figure awarded in employment tribunals being £29. He recommended a prescribed rate of £20 an hour. The 57th Update of the Civil Procedure Rules provided that in para 52.4

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll