header-logo header-logo

02 December 2011 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The costs of going solo

Michael Cook examines the financial implications of litigants in person

By definition you will never act for a litigant in person (LIP); but however much you may wish to ignore them, “Lippies”, as they are affectionately known, are not going to go away. Their rates have been increased, legal aid is to dwindle yet again, so they will proliferate.

Successive governments cannot be accused of offering financial inducements to litigants to do it themselves. As Sir Rupert Jackson observed in Chapter 14 of the final report of his Review of Civil Litigation Costs, the hourly rate allowed to successful litigants in person had not been increased from £9.25 per hour since 1 December 1995. Applying the average earnings index for private sector services, the figure in December 2009 would have risen to £15.32, while annual increases of £1 had resulted in the equivalent figure awarded in employment tribunals being £29. He recommended a prescribed rate of £20 an hour. The 57th Update of the Civil Procedure Rules provided that in para 52.4

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll