header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs—EAT

Graham v University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and others UKEAT/0130/13/LA, [2013] All ER (D) 58 (Oct)

It was established law that an appeal on costs could only succeed on the basis of an error of law. In relation to costs, that would include taking into consideration something irrelevant or something that was clearly wrong in the exercise of the discretion. If proceedings were misconceived, namely, had no reasonable prospect of success, and the tribunal considered it appropriate to do so, it could make an order for costs. It could specify the sum as long as it was under £20,000, and it could, if it say fit, have regard to the payer’s ability to pay when it came to decide whether to make an order and what that sum should be. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll