header-logo header-logo

04 July 2025 / Kris Kilsby
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs control

224725
Kris Kilsby explains how to avoid third-party challenges under the Solicitors Act
  • The Court of Appeal’s decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP paved the way for third parties to challenge solicitors’ bills of costs.
  • The challenge for executors and probate solicitors will be how to protect the costs in those bills, or avoid beneficiaries making such applications in the first place.
  • Solicitors need to produce clear and accurate estimates, erring on the side of caution.

The decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15, [2024] All ER (D) 72 (Jan) opened the door for third parties to have solicitors’ bills of costs assessed, and that such an assessment would have some teeth beyond what had been assumed before.

With the door firmly opened, it appears that many beneficiaries, particularly residuary beneficiaries, are now aware that their right to an assessment under the Solicitors Act 1974 is more likely to result in the bill being reduced upon assessment. For the beneficiaries, it will become a kind of zero-sum game in that every pound reduced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll