header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Citation Plc v Ellis Whittam Ltd [2012] EWHC 764 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 227 (Mar)

It was settled law that: (1) if no claim form was issued, then there was no litigation and so there were no costs of litigation, whatever costs might have been incurred in complying with a pre-action protocol; however (2) if a claim form was issued, the costs incurred in complying with a pre-action protocol might be recoverable as costs incidental to any subsequent proceedings.

The CPR provided a strong incentive to parties to engage in pre-action communications, with the risk to those who did not do that that they might not recover their costs, even if they brought an action in which they were the successful party.

The requirement that the parties engage in pre-action correspondence had deliberately been imposed at least in part with a view to extending the period during which each party would conduct its case on the basis that it had not been incurring a liability to pay the otherís costs if no action had been commenced.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll