header-logo header-logo

27 March 2013 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Categories: Features , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Costs budgeting: Teaching old dogs new tricks (Pt 1)

HHJ Simon Brown’s exclusive online guide to costs budgeting

CPR 3.12 to 18 and PD.3E are the key to case management under the new post-Jackson regime. Quite simply, all competent civil litigation practitioners, old and new, must learn how to budget and manage their costs within agreed budgets, or budgets approved by the judge. Judges must learn how to approve and manage budgets that are “proportionate” to what is at stake. Well that all sounds simple but how?

First...what is a “Budget”?
The CPR glossary describes it as an: “An estimate of the reasonable and proportionate costs (including disbursements) which a party intends to incur in the proceedings.” This mirrors the definition of Standard (cp Indemnity) costs in CPR 44.3.

Second...learn the 12 Rules (like the old 12x table!)

  1. Budgets must be filed by the date specified in the notice served under rule 26.3(1), or, if no such date is specified, seven days before the first CMC. (CPR 3.13)
  2. Budgets must be in
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll