header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , CPR
printer mail-detail

COSTLY REALLOCATIONS

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim...

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim to £5,000 and what had been a multi-track claim is reallocated to the small claims track. Can the court under any circumstances award the defendant his costs incurred prior to reallocation? No pre-reallocation orders for costs have been made.

The defendant can seek an order under CPR 44.9(2) (which provides that the costs regime for a particular track is to apply to the period before as well as after allocation except where the court or a Practice Direction says otherwise) that multi-track costs should apply up to reallocation. Ideally, the defendant should do so at the case management conference at which the reallocation has been directed.

If reallocation was directed by an own motion order, he should so within seven days of its service. Failure to act promptly could cause the defendant problems as in deciding whether to disapply r 44.9(2) the court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll