header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , CPR
printer mail-detail

COSTLY REALLOCATIONS

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim...

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim to £5,000 and what had been a multi-track claim is reallocated to the small claims track. Can the court under any circumstances award the defendant his costs incurred prior to reallocation? No pre-reallocation orders for costs have been made.

The defendant can seek an order under CPR 44.9(2) (which provides that the costs regime for a particular track is to apply to the period before as well as after allocation except where the court or a Practice Direction says otherwise) that multi-track costs should apply up to reallocation. Ideally, the defendant should do so at the case management conference at which the reallocation has been directed.

If reallocation was directed by an own motion order, he should so within seven days of its service. Failure to act promptly could cause the defendant problems as in deciding whether to disapply r 44.9(2) the court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll