header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011 / Ian Pegram , Lista M Cannon
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A costly mistake

Lista Cannon & Ian Pegram note the important lessons to emerge from the FSA’s recent activity

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued its largest ever fine for financial crime systems and controls failures on 21 July 2011. The FSA fined Willis Limited, the UK arm of the world’s third largest insurance and reinsurance broker, £6.895m.

While the present action was pursued under the UK’s financial regulatory framework, the FSA’s reasoning provides important guidance to businesses in all sectors on how the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) may assess whether anti-bribery procedures are “adequate” for the purpose of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010).

Background

The FSA examined Willis’s policies to counter the risks of corruption associated with making payments to overseas third parties who assisted Willis in winning business from overseas clients.

While the FSA acknowledged that Willis had in place a number of policies and procedures aimed at limiting and detecting corruption issues, it found that Willis had not taken reasonable care to establish and maintain effective anti-bribery systems and controls, but had created a “weak control environment” which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll