header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008 / Rachael Healey , Simon Henthorn
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Costly benefits

Are employers finding it too expensive to employ and insure older workers? Simon Henthorn & Rachael Healey

Age discrimination has received recent publicity with the Heyday challenge taking the stage in the European Court of Justice. However, the legislation creates other problems for employers. This article deals with the issue of provision of insurance benefits to older employees, particularly permanent health insurance (PHI) and private medical insurance.

The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031) (the Regulations) came into force on 1 October 2006, implementing the Framework Directive 2000/78/EC (the Directive). The Regulations provide that in employment and vocational training, it is unlawful to discriminate against workers on the grounds of age. Direct and indirect discrimination, victimisation, instructions to discriminate and harassment are all prohibited. The law covers workers of any age so both the young and old can claim protection.

Direct discrimination is less favourable treatment of a worker on the grounds of their age or apparent age—for instance a refusal to provide PHI cover only to workers over the age of 60. Indirect discrimination is the application of a provision, criterion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll