header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Tax , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The cost of settlement

Michael Tringham recounts how a £3m estate dispute racked up £400,000 in costs…

* * * * * *

So after three court hearings and estimated £400,000 legal costs, Thorner v Major and Others ([2009] All ER (D) 257 (Mar)) is finally settled. (Or is it? See below.) The case involves a Somerset farming family, some of whose members had not spoken to each other for many years.

David's father and Peter were first cousins. David, who never married, helped Peter at Steart Farm, Cheddar for almost 30 years, without remuneration. By 1997 will Peter left the residue of his estate to David, including his farm—but destroyed that will in order to remove one of the pecuniary legacies. After his death in November 2005 no will was found.

In accordance with the Intestacy Rules Peter's estate would then have devolved to his blood relatives. Except that David claimed to have the benefit of a proprietary estoppel against Peter and his estate, on the basis that over 15 years or more he acted to his considerable detriment in reliance on an expectation repeatedly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll