header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Tax , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The cost of settlement

Michael Tringham recounts how a £3m estate dispute racked up £400,000 in costs…

* * * * * *

So after three court hearings and estimated £400,000 legal costs, Thorner v Major and Others ([2009] All ER (D) 257 (Mar)) is finally settled. (Or is it? See below.) The case involves a Somerset farming family, some of whose members had not spoken to each other for many years.

David's father and Peter were first cousins. David, who never married, helped Peter at Steart Farm, Cheddar for almost 30 years, without remuneration. By 1997 will Peter left the residue of his estate to David, including his farm—but destroyed that will in order to remove one of the pecuniary legacies. After his death in November 2005 no will was found.

In accordance with the Intestacy Rules Peter's estate would then have devolved to his blood relatives. Except that David claimed to have the benefit of a proprietary estoppel against Peter and his estate, on the basis that over 15 years or more he acted to his considerable detriment in reliance on an expectation repeatedly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll