header-logo header-logo

27 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The cost of Jackson

ACL survey: “Jackson will increase costs disputes”

The number of costs disputes between solicitors and their clients will rise as a result of the Jackson reforms, costs lawyers have predicted.

As of next April, when the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) comes into force, success fees in “no-win, no-fee” cases will no longer be recoverable. Instead, clients will pay their own costs out of their damages and are therefore likely to take a keen interest in the amount of costs their solicitor racks up.

A survey of 137 members of the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL), published this week, showed 69% thought solicitor-client disputes would rise as a result.

Nearly a third of costs lawyers surveyed thought the Jackson reforms would discourage people from bringing cases, while more than half thought they would discourage solicitors from taking less straightforward cases.

Four out of 10 believe fierce competition will drive down the level of success fees, while nearly a third think costs will become more proportionate, and 42% think they will tilt the playing field in favour of defendants.

The survey uncovered common mistakes and misunderstandings by solicitors when dealing with costs. Failing to keep thorough records was the main complaint, followed by “they think they can do it themselves”. Other complaints included using unqualified costs draftsmen and only calling costs lawyers in when things have gone wrong.

Iain Stark, chairman of the ACL, says: “It is inevitable that solicitor/own client disputes will re-emerge post-LASPO, while the judiciary is emphasising how central costs management will be in the future.

“The truth is that many solicitors have neither the time nor experience to maximise the recovery of their own costs, and this is only going to become more difficult post-Jackson.”

Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll