header-logo header-logo

20 October 2016 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Cost benefit analysis

Costs orders: who pays & when, asks Kerry Underwood

    • Wasted costs orders in civil litigation—a rapidly developing area of law.

    Wasted costs orders can only be made against a representative, whereas non-party costs orders can be made against anyone, including a representative.

    In both cases the power derives from s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Sub-section (3) provides that “the court shall have full power to determine by whom and to what extent the costs are to be paid” and this covers the county court, High Court and the civil division of the Court of Appeal (s 51(1)).

    This piece deals with wasted costs orders in civil litigation (but there are similar sanctions in the criminal courts and in tribunals) and non-party costs orders.

    Wasted costs

    Wasted costs includes disallowing costs and ordering payment of costs (s 51(6)) and can be at the suit of the representative’s own client or the other side (Medcalf v Mardell [2002] UKHL 27, [2002] All

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Anthony Collins—20 promotions

    Anthony Collins—20 promotions

    20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

    Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

    Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

    Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

    Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

    NEWS
    The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
    Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
    Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
    Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
    A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
    back-to-top-scroll