header-logo header-logo

24 February 2023 / Dr Charanjit Singh
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Correcting mistakes in the magistrates’ courts

112061
To what extent has the Court of Appeal clarified the power of the magistrates’ court to reopen cases in order to rectify mistakes? Dr Charanjit Singh reports
  • Examines R (on the application of Simon Williamson) v City of Westminster, in which the Court of Appeal has sought to define the application of s 142 of the Magistrates Court Act 1980 (MCA 1980).
  • Presents a practical examination of case law and explores the implications for defendants’ seeking to reopen their cases following a guilty plea and sentencing.
  • Notes the current position of the law under s 142, MCA 1980.

Few would argue against the notion that some of the systemic safeguards designed to mitigate miscarriages of justice, prevent the abuse of due process, and assure that convictions of the guilty are beyond reasonable doubt (Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462) are some of the most important aspects of British criminal justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Williamson) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWHC 1444 (Admin); R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll