header-logo header-logo

05 March 2020 / David Lawson
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Features , Public , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Coronavirus quarantine

16946
The government has published its Coronavirus action plan but said little about the wider possibilities & implications, such as ‘area quarantine‘, says David Lawson

On 20 October 1831 the Privy Council met to consider the response to the cholera epidemic in Europe and ordered that regulations be published in the London Gazette ‘as the disease approaches the neighbouring shores’. In every town ‘one or more houses’ was to be prepared to receive the sick because ‘the most effectual means of preventing the spreading of any pestilence has always been found to be the immediate separation of the sick from the healthy’.

The origin of the term ‘quarantine’ is much older, probably relating to some fourteenth century Italian city states initially having a 30-day isolation period for ships from plague areas (a trentino) and then increasing this to 40 days (a quarantino).

We have seen two recent applications of quarantine, the reportedly robust system implemented in China in response to this coronavirus outbreak and the attempt to manage the challenges of Ebola in the a few years

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll