header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Copyright—Infringement—Film props

Lucasfilm Ltd and others v Ainsworth and another [2011] UKSC 39, [2011] All ER (D) 257 (Jul)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips, P, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Collins, 27 Jul 2011
A judge was entitled to find that a helmet worn by a fictional character in a film was not a “sculpture” for the purposes of copyright protection. Provided there was a basis for in personam jurisdiction over the defendant, an English court may have jurisdiction to try a claim for infringement of foreign copyright.

Jonathan Sumption QC, Michael Bloch QC and Alan Bryson (instructed by Harbottle & Lewis LLP) for the claimants. Alastair Wilson QC and George Hamer (instructed by S C Andrew LLP) for the defendants.

The proceedings concerned intellectual property rights in various artefacts made for the Star Wars franchise, principally the helmet for the stormtrooper characters. The defendant, based in England, had some expertise in vacuum-moulding in plastic, and made prototypes and then 50 helmets for use in the film. The claimants held copyright in the artistic works created for the Star Wars films. In 2004 the defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll