header-logo header-logo

26 April 2013
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Copyright

Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and others [2013] UKSC 18, [2013] All ER (D) 102 (Apr)

The Supreme Court decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union the question whether the requirements of Art 5(1) of Counsel Directive (EC) 2001/29 (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), that acts of reproduction should be: (i) temporary; (ii) transient or incidental; and (iii) an integral and essential part of the technological process, had been satisfied by the technical features in issue, having regard in particular to the fact that a copy of protected material might, in the ordinary course of internet usage, remain in the cache for a period of time after the browsing session which had generated that copy had been completed until it was overlaid by other material, and a screen copy would remain on screen until the browsing session had been terminated by the user.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll