header-logo header-logo

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Conveyancing shake-up welcomed

The government has dropped its proposal for ‘dual conveyancing’ where one conveyancer would work for both parties. Critics raised conflict of interest concerns.

However, it will introduce greater transparency over referral fees and has not ruled out banning them altogether.

Conveyancers welcomed the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government’s response this week to its Call for Evidence on ‘Improving the home buying and selling process’.

Proposals include a voluntary reservation agreement to stop gazumping and an enforceable Code of Practice for estate agents.

Eddie Goldsmith, chairman of the Conveyancing Association, said: ‘If we are being brutally honest then we would have preferred a larger degree of mandation particularly around, for example, providing certainty on completion with, for example, with the use of our own Conveyancer’s Code for Completion.’

Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll