header-logo header-logo

05 March 2018
Issue: 7784 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Controversy over ‘cab rank’ burials

The Chief Coroner, Judge Mark Lucraft QC has taken the unprecedented step of backing a judicial review against his colleague’s decision to apply a ‘cab rank rule’ to burials.

The ‘cab rank’ approach ignores religious concerns for early burial—Jewish and Islamic beliefs require the deceased to be buried on the same day as death or as soon as possible thereafter. Instead, no one burial can be given priority over another.

Judge Lucraft’s name has been added to the legal action, which will be heard by a Divisional Court at the end of this month, and he has publicly criticised the decision, by Senior Coroner for Inner North London, Mary Hassell, as ‘over rigid’, ‘unlawful’ and in breach of Art 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects religious beliefs.

Hassell made the rule change in October 2017. The judicial review is being brought by the Adath Yisroel Burial Society.

However, Stephen Evans, chief executive of the National Secular Society, expressed support for Hassell. He said grieving families had regularly exerted pressure on Hassell’s officers to release bodies, leading her to make the rule change.

In a letter to the Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor in January, he said: ‘By prioritising those who give religion as their reason for a quick burial, those who want rapid burials for other reasons are being unfairly treated. I trust you will ensure that the judicial response to this matter is not unduly influenced by those who shout the loudest.’

Doctors report deaths to coroners for various reasons, for example, where the death was sudden and unexplained or violent or where the deceased was not seen by a doctor during their final illness. The coroner may decide a post-mortem is needed to discover the cause of death. After this, if the cause is still unknown, they may hold an inquest.

Issue: 7784 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll