header-logo header-logo

21 April 2021 / David Burrows
Issue: 7929 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Controlled conditions: court documents in family proceedings

46633
David Burrows outlines the extent & limitation of the court’s control of documents
  • Limitation on court’s ability to refuse release of documents.
  • Limiting access to documents: where strictly necessary.
  • Permission to appeal: compelling reasons.

The background to Re R (Children: Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162, [2021] All ER (D) 58 (Feb) (12 February 2021) shows one extreme of the spectrum of the extent to which the family courts can control release of documents and other evidence in family proceedings. It also provides an opportunity to consider the narrow range of the extent to which a court can control evidence generally, and more specifically (in the case of Re R) the control of release of court documents to a party to proceedings. Normally a party to proceedings would expect to have full access to all documents in a case—as would the court or other parties to proceedings. It will only be in exceptional circumstances, that this right to access will be in any way restricted (Re B (Disclosure to Other Parties)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll