header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Contract

Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v Tunnicliffe [2011] EWHC 1658 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 03 (Jul)

It was settled law that the correct approach to construction of a written contract was, first, that one was seeking to “ascertain the meaning which the document would convey to a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would reasonably have been available to the parties in the situation in which they were at the time of the contract”. Secondly, in the context of a reinsurance contract, and in particular one expressed to be “subject to all terms, clauses, and conditions as Original and to follow the Original in every respect ...”, the factual matrix included the terms of and circumstances surrounding the underlying policy. Thirdly, the factual matrix would also include evidence about relevant market practices, which were widespread but not universal, if the existence of such practices was part of the background known to each party. Further, if the parties had used terms which bore not only an ordinary meaning and acceptation, but also one peculiar to the department of trade or business to whic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll