header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Issue: 7436 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contract

Giedo Van Der Garde BV and another v Force India Formula One Team Ltd [2010] EWHC 2373 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 122 (Sep)

Where there had been a total failure of consideration, money paid under a contract could be recovered. A partial failure of consideration would give no rise to a claim for recovery of the money that had been paid. However, if a divisible part of the contract wholly failed, and part of the consideration could be attributed to that part, that portion of the money so paid could be recovered. Where a court could identify by the process of apportionment a payment for which there had been no consideration in the form of services provided, the payer would be entitled to an order for the restitution of that sum. Where the contract was not divisible, there could be no restitution. The receipt of a benefit under a contract which on analysis was not any part of the essential bargain contract for would not be a bar to restitution on the basis of total consideration. The test for whether a benefit received was an essential part of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll