header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Features , Damages , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Contingency matters

Kerry Underwood welcomes the first steps to full contingency fees

Contingency fee agreements are prohibited in any issued case in the High Court or County Court in England and Wales, but this may be about to change, as a result of the Jackson Report.

“Contingency fee” is used to describe an agreement by which the client’s lawyer is only paid if the claim is successful and is then paid out of damages received, usually as a percentage of those damages, the percentage being fixed in advance of the claim being made. Pure conditional fee agreements are a form of contingency fee in that the client’s obligation to pay is contingent upon winning but that extra fee is a percentage uplift on costs and is unrelated to damages.

Success fees conditional

No win, lower fee conditional fee agreements, increasingly used in commercial cases, are a strange hybrid where, as the name suggests, the solicitor gets a higher hourly rate for winning, but still gets paid in the event of defeat, albeit a lower fee. In the event of victory there is also a success

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll