header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Contesting validity

Paul Hewitt and Adam Cloherty report on recent cases involving forgery and stale claims on insolvent estates

In O’Brien v Seagrave [2007] EWHC 788 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 56 (Apr) the claimant had been the deceased’s partner for 12 years before his death in January 2005. However, following the deceased’s death, the defendants—the deceased’s long estranged ex-wife, J, and her son, the deceased’s step-son, L—produced a purported will in which the deceased apparently left his entire estate to L and L’s children. The defendants procured probate of the will in September 2005.

The claimant alleged the purported will was a forgery on the basis that the deceased could not have been at L’s house at the time the will was said to have been executed there—it was apparently witnessed by L’s partner and a friend. She commenced proceedings for the revocation of probate and a declaration that the will was invalid. Part of the motivation for the claimant’s claim was that her Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) claim would be more valuable on intestacy than under the will.

INTEREST

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll