header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Contesting validity

Paul Hewitt and Adam Cloherty report on recent cases involving forgery and stale claims on insolvent estates

In O’Brien v Seagrave [2007] EWHC 788 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 56 (Apr) the claimant had been the deceased’s partner for 12 years before his death in January 2005. However, following the deceased’s death, the defendants—the deceased’s long estranged ex-wife, J, and her son, the deceased’s step-son, L—produced a purported will in which the deceased apparently left his entire estate to L and L’s children. The defendants procured probate of the will in September 2005.

The claimant alleged the purported will was a forgery on the basis that the deceased could not have been at L’s house at the time the will was said to have been executed there—it was apparently witnessed by L’s partner and a friend. She commenced proceedings for the revocation of probate and a declaration that the will was invalid. Part of the motivation for the claimant’s claim was that her Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) claim would be more valuable on intestacy than under the will.

INTEREST

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll