header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Contempt of court—Appeal against sentence—Role of Court of Appeal

B v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 828, [2011] All ER (D) 188 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Laws, Longmore and Etherton LJJ, 21 July 2011

The approach of the Court of Appeal exercising its appellate jurisdiction under s 13 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 (AJA 1960) in respect of a sentence imposed for contempt of court is to determine whether the sentence was manifestly excessive; it is not a judicial review exercise.

Hugh Southey QC and Kate Markus (instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners) for the appellant. Robin Tam QC and Steven Gray (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the respondent

The appellant, B, was subject to proceedings before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC). SIAC formed the view that B was a high level risk to the UK. He was not a UK citizen and was made subject to stringent bail conditions. The secretary of state wished to deport him to Algeria, since it was believed he was an Algerian citizen. B refused to disclose his real identity, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll