header-logo header-logo

03 September 2015
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Consumers in the insolvency queue

The Law Commission has set out proposals for greater consumer protection when a retailer goes bust.

The Commission examined 20 well-known high street insolvencies occurring between 2008 and 2014, as well as a number of smaller retailers.

Writing in NLJ this week, Stephen Lewis, Laura Burgoyne & Conor McLaughlin of the Law Commission explain they decided against the calls of some consumer bodies for all consumers to be paid in priority to other creditors as not practical or proportionate. This was because of the other interests involved, including employees, secured creditors and other unsecured creditors such as suppliers and self-employed contractors.

Instead, they suggest that there may be a case for a “limited preferential category of consumer claims where more than £100 has been paid in the three months leading up to insolvency, and where no other protections are available”.

This “would benefit consumers who part with significant sums in cash or by cheque,” they write.

Issue: 7666 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll