header-logo header-logo

25 May 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Consumer affairs

How can we protect victims of unfair commercial practices, ask David Hertzell & Amy Smith

This month is Scams Awareness Month. Research commissioned by Consumer Focus in 2009 found that around two thirds of those questioned had been subjected to misleading or aggressive sales practices. They estimated that these practices cost consumers around £3.3bn every year. Moreover, honest businesses are undermined by the unscrupulous.

Speak out

The Trading Standards Institute, Citizens Advice, and Action Fraud are encouraging consumers to speak out if they have been a victim of a scam. They are also helping consumers to recognise a scam. But what happens when you fall victim to a misleading or aggressive sales practice? The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission have recently published a report which deals with these issues.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (the regulations) implemented the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive into UK law in 2008. The regulations prohibit unfair commercial practices which include: misleading actions, misleading omissions and aggressive practices. The regulations also have a blacklist of 31 automatically unfair commercial practices. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll