header-logo header-logo

Construction

19 October 2012
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Alstom Power Ltd v SOMI Impianti SRL [2012] EWHC 2644 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 74 (Oct)

It was settled law that, where a contract provided that the plant and materials “shall be deemed” or “shall be considered” to be the property of the employer, the words would be regarded as ambiguous. In such a case, other provisions of the contract might be taken into account in order to decide whether the contract had the effect of passing the legal property in the plant and materials to the employer or whether, as the prima facie meaning of the words suggested, it did not have that effect but merely entitled the employer to act as if the property in the plant and materials had passed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll