header-logo header-logo

16 August 2018 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A conspiracy too far?

nlj_7806_arnheim

Dr Michael Arnheim takes issue with the conviction of two schoolboys for conspiracy to murder through a Columbine-style shooting

  • Two 15-year-old boys were convicted of conspiracy to murder teachers and pupils at their school in imitation of the 1999 Columbine massacre—even though they had no weapons and had evidently never handled a firearm.
  • The statutory law of conspiracy, drafted on the basis of a Law Commission recommendation, is not fit for purpose.
  • The Law Commission’s Draft Bill (2009), published as part of a moribund codification programme, is even worse.

On 20 July 2018, two 15-year-old boys, Thomas Wyllie and Alex Bolland, were convicted of a conspiracy (when aged 14) to murder teachers and pupils at their own school by shooting them in a re-enactment of the Columbine school massacre in Colorado in 1999. They were sentenced to 12 and 10 years’ imprisonment, respectively.

In sentencing, the judge emphasised: ‘The conspiracy to murder of which you have been convicted was not wishful thinking or a fantasy. It was a real plot: the jury was sure that you intended to carry out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll