header-logo header-logo

26 January 2022
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Consolidation is on the way

Nearly half of law firms are considering mergers and acquisitions (M&As), researchers have found

Some 47 of 100 law firms of varying sizes interviewed were considering M&A―nearly a quarter of them were already in talks, and 57% were ‘actively’ seeking a deal, with the rest of the firms at an earlier stage. Acquira Professional Services, which commissioned the research, published the results last week in its white paper, ‘Growth Agenda 2022: the new era of law firm M&A’.

The firms gave geographic expansion as their chief reason for considering M&A, followed by desires to expand their range of practice areas, scale-up and compete.

Those firms not looking at M&A said they don’t need to grow. Other reasons given were the cost of M&A (cited by 36%), the loss of control (30%), the risk involved (23%) and potential loss of identity (21%).

Asked how they will drive growth, most interviewees said they expect to invest in IT. Private equity investment was another popular option, with more than a third expecting to grow through this route, while about the same amount said they would rely on sales and marketing. Some 18% of the large firms were considering flotation, as were 9% of mid-sized and 4% of smaller firms. More than a quarter of large firms were looking to buy a non-legal business.

However, the white paper struck a cautious note, noting how ‘the few private equity firms interested in the legal market are generally looking at practices with non-traditional business models, such as subscription services which generate repeat business. They want to build scale. Any notion that it is an easy way for partners to cash out will send them running for the hills’.

It also highlighted one of the reasons mergers go wrong is they often start in an informal way, for example, through a chance meeting.

Jeff Zindani, Acquira managing director, said: ‘The findings back up the general sentiment in the market that greater consolidation is on the way. By embracing an M&A strategy, even on a modest scale, with the support of an expert adviser, market opportunities can be quickly realised.’

Issue: 7964 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll