header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 April 2024 / C Haward Soper
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Profession , Contract , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Consequential loss: searching for the meaning

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
167816
What’s the true meaning of ‘consequential loss’? C Haward Soper consults the case law—and that other authoritative source, ChatGPT…
  • Considers what commercial professionals mean by the term ‘consequential loss’ and provides a summary of relevant case law.
  • Compares these definitions with those given as a result of entering prompts into ChatGPT, showing that AI’s usefulness in this area is limited for now.

All contract professionals will be aware of—and perhaps scared of—consequential loss. It’s a matter of interest to any lawyer engaged in the drafting of indemnities or exclusion clauses, whether in general commercial contracts or in mergers and acquisitions.

To help clarify the meaning of the term, I have consulted the relevant case law—and enlisted the help of an expert, ChatGPT, for advice. According to CBS News, one lawyer used ChatGPT last year to prepare for a court hearing. It went horribly awry, with ChatGPT inventing ‘court cases that didn’t exist’. My experiments in AI also show that its usefulness is limited.

Precise limitation

Why do we expert contract/commercial analysts work so hard to negotiate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll