header-logo header-logo

12 September 2013 / Charles Lazarevic
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

A consequential loss

Could mis-selling in the derivatives market be the PPI equivalent for small businesses? Charles Lazarevic reports

Recently it has been suggested that the banks face claims in excess of £10bn as a result of the alleged mis-selling of complex interest rate derivatives. I have dealt with several cases where the consequences of these “swap” charges have been devastating on the business, with significant losses to the business-owners in some cases.

How has this situation arisen?

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), previously the Financial Services Authority, has conducted a review into the interest rate hedging products banks sold to businesses as a means of managing fluctuations in interest rates, also known as interest rate swap agreements (IRSAs). In the review, the FCA identified four broad categories of IRSAs sold: swaps, caps, collars, and “structured collars”. Some of the more complex products, particularly structured collars, speculated on interest rates and resulted in customers paying much more when the interest base rate fell below an agreed level, for no apparent benefit to the business. The FCA decided that this area required a finely balanced judgment on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll