header-logo header-logo

03 January 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Conflicting rights: a stand-off?

​Alec Samuels reports on secrecy, privacy, confidentiality & anonymity in the courtroom

  • The general rule is that a hearing is to be in public.
  • The requirement for a hearing to be in public does not require the court to make special arrangements for accommodating members of the public.

Publicity is important, but justice even more so. In contemporary times many situations raise conflicts between the human rights of a fair and public hearing (Art 6), the right to privacy and family life (Art 8) and the right of free speech (Art 10).

The leading cases are:

  • Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 437–438, [1911-13] All ER Rep 1.
  • R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 2, [2016] 1 WLR 444, paras [14]–[20] and [36], [2017] 1 All ER 513.
  • A v BBC [2014] UKSC 25, [2015] AC 588 [2014] 2 All ER 827.
  • V v T [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 293 (Oct).
  • Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd v Dechert LLP [2016] EWCA Civ 375, [2016] 1 WLR 5027, paras [38]–[40], [2016] All ER (D) 19 (May).
  • X
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll